<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cross-browser testing: IE6 and IE7 (and maybe more&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/</link>
	<description>Random developer notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 09:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasya</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>You may want to take a look at this new fast &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.browserseal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cross browser screenshot application&lt;/a&gt;.

Currently it only supports Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari on Windows, but as it is being actively developed more features and additional browsers will be added in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to take a look at this new fast <a href="http://www.browserseal.com" rel="nofollow">cross browser screenshot application</a>.</p>
<p>Currently it only supports Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari on Windows, but as it is being actively developed more features and additional browsers will be added in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zzzz</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Zzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>All this would be great info is great, but seeing as Microsoft started charging for this VPC in 2008, it&#039;s more like a great &quot;desk-reference&quot; for how things got to be the way they are now...  Good stuff.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this would be great info is great, but seeing as Microsoft started charging for this VPC in 2008, it&#8217;s more like a great &#8220;desk-reference&#8221; for how things got to be the way they are now&#8230;  Good stuff&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solo</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Solo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>I use standalone versions of IE6 and IE5.5 along with my installed Firefox and IE7. The standalones aren&#039;t 100% usable, but they work pretty well for checking layouts and look on the older IE browsers:
http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use standalone versions of IE6 and IE5.5 along with my installed Firefox and IE7. The standalones aren&#8217;t 100% usable, but they work pretty well for checking layouts and look on the older IE browsers:<br />
<a href="http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone" rel="nofollow">http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerd</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>M$ have these problems because they tried to integrate IE so tightly that it HAD do be installed.  A disk image just to be able to run IE6 sucks!  Bah!  M$ is gay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M$ have these problems because they tried to integrate IE so tightly that it HAD do be installed.  A disk image just to be able to run IE6 sucks!  Bah!  M$ is gay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stickman</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Stickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t tested much in IE7 so far. We have it installed on one machine -- which, coincidentally or otherwise, has now become almost chronically unstable -- but other than quick &#039;does it work?&#039; checks I&#039;ve not spent any time with it.

While I applaud MS&#039; decision to release these disk images, I&#039;d have preferred it if I could keep IE6 installed and have a disk image with IE7...:) I&#039;ll probably wait for another couple of releases before I install it anywhere important -- MS has always needed a couple of tries before getting things right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tested much in IE7 so far. We have it installed on one machine &#8212; which, coincidentally or otherwise, has now become almost chronically unstable &#8212; but other than quick &#8216;does it work?&#8217; checks I&#8217;ve not spent any time with it.</p>
<p>While I applaud MS&#8217; decision to release these disk images, I&#8217;d have preferred it if I could keep IE6 installed and have a disk image with IE7&#8230;:) I&#8217;ll probably wait for another couple of releases before I install it anywhere important &#8212; MS has always needed a couple of tries before getting things right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Rightly or wrongly, I have so far refused to install IE7 on either my home or work machines. I have a tablet PC sitting along side my work machine onto which I have IE7 installed - and I don&#039;t like it. I use it for testing only.

MS&#039;s arrogance in still trying to ride rough shot over every &#039;web experience&#039; with their own half-baked idea of standards implementation, is what really chaps my buttocks.

Look at the up-coming implementation of High Assurance SSL (or ESSL - Extended SSL as it&#039;s now called) to see what I mean. CSS, JS...all of these things are examples of MS trying to force their own view and handling of &#039;the web&#039;.

I would say that if you can - install IE7 on another machine. Preferably something you don&#039;t really use for much else.

In reality, if you code correctly and test on Firefox and IE6, 99.9% of the time IE7 will be fine as well. THAT SAID, IE7 has a somewhat unique handling of older Javascript - which has currently rendered one of the menu&#039;s in an application here, completely un-usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rightly or wrongly, I have so far refused to install IE7 on either my home or work machines. I have a tablet PC sitting along side my work machine onto which I have IE7 installed &#8211; and I don&#8217;t like it. I use it for testing only.</p>
<p>MS&#8217;s arrogance in still trying to ride rough shot over every &#8216;web experience&#8217; with their own half-baked idea of standards implementation, is what really chaps my buttocks.</p>
<p>Look at the up-coming implementation of High Assurance SSL (or ESSL &#8211; Extended SSL as it&#8217;s now called) to see what I mean. CSS, JS&#8230;all of these things are examples of MS trying to force their own view and handling of &#8216;the web&#8217;.</p>
<p>I would say that if you can &#8211; install IE7 on another machine. Preferably something you don&#8217;t really use for much else.</p>
<p>In reality, if you code correctly and test on Firefox and IE6, 99.9% of the time IE7 will be fine as well. THAT SAID, IE7 has a somewhat unique handling of older Javascript &#8211; which has currently rendered one of the menu&#8217;s in an application here, completely un-usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stickman</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Stickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Yeah I posted a link to that (or something very similar) in the earlier article mentioned above. In fact I used that method myself until I had to reinstall Windows recently.

While it&#039;s fine for most purposes, like testing layout, there are limitations (aside from slightly iffy stability): for example, I had problems when it came to testing security settings. I assume it&#039;s because IE is tightly coupled to Windows itself, and so changes made by one version might &#039;spill over&#039; into another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I posted a link to that (or something very similar) in the earlier article mentioned above. In fact I used that method myself until I had to reinstall Windows recently.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s fine for most purposes, like testing layout, there are limitations (aside from slightly iffy stability): for example, I had problems when it came to testing security settings. I assume it&#8217;s because IE is tightly coupled to Windows itself, and so changes made by one version might &#8216;spill over&#8217; into another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solid</title>
		<link>http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Solid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-stickman.com/web-development/cross-browser-testing-ie6-and-ie7-and-maybe-more/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Install multiple versions of IE on one PC: http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Install multiple versions of IE on one PC: <a href="http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE" rel="nofollow">http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

